Literature Cited

 

Abbruzzese, B., and S.G. Leibowitz. 1997. A synoptic approach for assessing cumulative impacts to wetlands. Environmental Management 21(3):457-475.

 

Adamus, P.R. 1993a. User's manual: Avian richness evaluation method (AREM) for lowland wetlands of the Colorado Plateau. EPA/600/R-93/240. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR. 72 pp. NTIS # PB93186260.

 

Adamus, P.R. 1993b. Irrigated wetlands of the Colorado Plateau: Information synthesis and habitat evaluation method. EPA/600/R-93/071. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR.

 

Adamus, P.R. 1995. Validating a habitat evaluation method for predicting avian richness. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23(4):743-749.

 

Adamus, P.R., E.J. Clairain, R.D. Smith, and R.E. Young. 1987. Wetland evaluation technique (WET), Volume II: Methodology. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. NTIS No. ADA 189968.

 

Adamus, P.R., L.T. Stockwell, E.J. Clairain, M.E. Morrow, L.D. Rozas, and R.D. Smith. 1991. Wetland evaluation technique (WET), Volume I; Literature review and evaluation rationale. Technical Report WRP-DE-2, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. 287 pp.

 

Ainslie, W.B., R.D. Smith, B.A. Pruitt, T.H. Roberts, E.J. Sparks, L.W. West, G.L. Godshalk, and M.V. Miller. 1999. A regional guidebook for assessing the functions of low gradient riverine wetlands in Western Kentucky. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-17. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. 203 pp. + Appendices.

 

Ammann, A.P., R.W. Frazen, and J.L. Johnson. 1986. Method for the Evaluation of Inland Wetlands in Connecticut. DEP Bulletin No. 9. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, CT.

 

Ammann, A.P. and A. Lindley Stone. 1991. Method for the comparative evaluation of nontidal wetlands in New Hampshire. NHDES-WRD-1991-3. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Concord, NH.

 

Bartoldus, C.C. 1999a. A Comprehensive Review of Wetland Assessment Procedures: A Guide for Wetland Practitioners. Environmental Concern Inc., St. Michaels, MD. 196 pp. http://www.wetland.org

 

Bartoldus, C.C. 1999b. Standard Guide for the Assessment of Wetland Functions (E1983-98). American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), W. Conshohocken, PA. 27 pp.

 

Bartoldus, C.C., E.W. Garbisch, and M.L. Kraus. 1994. Evaluation for planned wetlands (EPW). Environmental Concern Inc., St. Michaels, MD. 327 pp. + Appendices.

 

Berglund, J. 1996. MDT Montana wetland field evaluation form and instructions (July 1, 1996; Appendix A revised 9/23/1997). Prepared for the Montana Department of Transportation, Helena, MT. 19 pp. + Appendices.

 

Bradshaw, J.G. 1991. A technique for the functional assessment of nontidal wetlands in the coastal plain of Virginia. Special Report No. 315 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA.

 

Brinson, M.M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. 79 pp. + Appendix.

 

Brinson, M.M., R. Hauer, L.C. Lee, W.L. Nutter, R. Rheinhardt, R.D. Smith, and D.F. Whigham. 1996. Guidebook for application of hydrogeomorphic assessment to riverine wetlands (Operational Draft). Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-11. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.

 

Brinson, M.M, L.C. Lee, W. Ainslie, R.D. Rheinhardt, G.G. Hollands, R.D. Smith, D.F. Whigham, and W.B. Nutter. 1997. Common misconceptions of the hydrogeomorphic approach to functional assessment of wetland ecosystems: Scientific and technical issues. Society of Wetland Scientists Bulletin 14(2):16-21.

 

Brinson, M.M, D.F. Whigham, L.C. Lee, R.D. Rheinhardt, W.B. Ainslie, G.G. Hollands, W.L. Nutter, and R.D. Smith 1998. More clarification regarding the HGM Approach. Society of Wetland Scientists Bulletin 15(1):7-10.

 

Bryan, R.R., M. Dionne, R. Cook, J. Jones, and A. Goodspeed. 1997. Maine Citizens Guide to Evaluating, Restoring, and Managing Tidal Marshes. Maine Audubon Society, Falmouth, ME. 87 pp. + Appendices.

 

Cable, T.T., V. Brack, Jr., and V.R. Holmes. 1989. Simplified method for wetland habitat assessment. Environmental Management 13:207-213.

 

Cook, R.A., A.J. Lindley Stone, and A.P. Ammann. 1993. Method for the evaluation and inventory of vegetated tidal marshes in New Hampshire. Audubon Society of New Hampshire, Concord, NH. 77 pp. + Appendices.

 

Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, FWS/OBS-79/31, Washington, DC.

 

Dagget, S. 1994. Stage 1 watershed assessment: Final report. Oregon Division of State Lands, Salem, Oregon, 52 pp.

 

Danielson, T.J. 1998. Wetland bioassessment fact sheets. EPA 843-F-09-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watershed, Wetlands Division, Washington, D.C., 22 pp.

 

Environmental Work Group (EWG). 1998. Wetland value assessment methodology and community models. Environmental Work Group, Coastal Wetland Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act (CWPPRA). 13 pp. + Appendices.

 

Fugro East, Inc. 1995. A method for the assessment of wetland function. Prepared for the Maryland Department of the Environment, Baltimore, MD. Prepared by Fugro East, Inc., Northborough, MA. 240 pp. + Appendix.

 

Frye, R. 1995. Wildlife habitat appraisal procedure (WHAP). Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, TX.

 

Golet, F.C. 1976. Wildlife wetland evaluation model. Pages 13-34 In Larson, J.S. (ed). Models for assessment of freshwater wetlands, Publication No. 32, Water Resources Research Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

 

Golet, F.C., and J.S. Larson. 1974. Classification of freshwater wetlands in the glaciated northeast. Resource Publication 116, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 56 pp.

 

Heeley, R.W. and W.S. Motts. 1976. A model for the evaluation of ground-water resources associated with wetlands. Pages 52-65 In Larson, J.S. (ed). Models for assessment of freshwater wetlands, Publication No. 32, Water Resources Research Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

 

Hicks, A.L. 1997. New England Freshwater Wetlands Invertebrate Biomonitoring Protocol (NEFWIBP). The Environmental Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. 42 pp.

 

Hollands, G.G., and D.W. Magee. 1985. A method for assessing the functions of wetlands. Pages 108-118 In J. Kusler and P. Riexinger (eds.), Proceedings of the national wetland assessment symposium, Association of Wetland Managers, Berne, NY.

 

Hruby, T. 1997. Continuing the discussion: Scientific and technical issues regarding the hydrogeomorphic approach to function assessment of wetlands. Society of Wetland Scientists Bulletin 13(3):23-24.

 

Hruby, T. 1998. The HGM dialogue: What is science and what is belief? Society of Wetland Scientists Bulletin 15(2):6-8.

 

Hruby, T. and T. Granger. 1998. Methods for assessing wetland functions. Volume II: Procedures for collecting data in the lowlands of western Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #98-107. 51 pp. + Appendices.

 

Hruby, T., W.R. Cesaneck, and K.E. Miller. 1995. Estimating relative wetland values for regional planning. Wetlands 15(2):93-107.

 

Hruby, T., T. Granger, K. Brunner, S. Cooke, K. Dublanica, R. Gersib, L. Reinelt, K. Richter, D. Sheldon, A. Wald, and F. Weinmann. 1998. Methods for assessing wetland functions. Volume I: Riverine and depressional wetlands in the lowlands of western Washington. WA State Department Ecology Publication #98-106, July 1998. 455 pp. + Appendices.

 

Karr, J.R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6(6): 21-27.

 

Karr, J.R. 1998 (In press). Rivers as sentinels: Using the biology of rivers to guide landscape management. In R.J. Naiman and R.E. Bilby (eds). River ecology and management: Lessons from the Pacific coastal region, Springer-Verlag, NY.

 

Karr, J.R. and E.W. Chu. 1997. Biological monitoring and assessment: Using multimetric indexes effectively. EPA 235-R97-001. University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

 

Karr, J.R. and E.W. Chu. 1998. Restoring life in running waters: Better biological monitoring. Island Press, Covelo, CA. 200 pp.

 

Kusler, J. 1997. Wetland assessment: A regulatory assessment method (RA) (Review Draft 10/15/97). Association of State Wetland Managers, Institute for Wetland Science and Public Policy, Technical Report, Berne, NY. 158 pp.

 

Kusler, J. and W. Niering. 1998. Wetland assessment: Have we lost our way? National Wetlands Newsletter 20(2):8-14.

 

Larson, J.S. (ed). 1976. Models for assessment of freshwater wetlands, Publication No. 32, Water Resources Research Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

 

Lawrence Regional Riparian Technical Team (LRRTT). 1997. Draft interim HGM model for Kansas wooded riverine wetlands. Web site: http//159.189.24.10/2listates/Kansas.htm

 

Leibowitz, S.G., B. Abbruzzese, P.R Adamus, L.E. Hughes, and J.T. Irish. 1992. A synoptic approach to cumulative impact assessment: A proposed methodology. EPA/600/R-92/167. U.S. EPA, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR. 129 pp.

 

Lipsky, A. 1997. Narragansett bay method: A manual for salt marsh evaluation. Save the Bay, Providence, RI. 22 pp. + Attachments.

 

Lodge, T.E., H.O. Hillestad, S.W. Carney, and R.B. Darling. 1995. Wetland Quality Index (WQI): A method for determining compensatory mitigation requirements for ecologically impacted wetlands. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers South Florida Section Annual Meeting, Sept 22-23, 1995, Miami, FL.

 

Lonard, R.I., E.J. Clairain, Jr., R.T. Huffman, J.W. Hardy, C.D. Brown, P.E. Ballard, and J.W. Watts. 1981. Analysis of methodologies used for the assessment of wetland values. Final Report - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Water Resources Council, Washington, D.C.

 

Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (LDNR). 1994. Habitat assessment models for fresh swamp and bottomland hardwoods within the Louisiana coastal zone. Louisiana Dept. of Natural Resources, Baton Rouge, LA. 10 pp. + Appendices.

 

Magee, D.W. 1998. A Rapid Procedure for Assessing Wetland Functional Capacity. Normandeau Associates, Bedford, NH. (Available from the Association of State Wetland Managers, Berne, NY). 190 pp.

 

Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE). 1997. Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) landscape level wetland functional assessment method additional guidance for use, regionalization, and revisions. Memo dated March 26, 1997, MDE, Baltimore, MD.

 

Miller, R.E., and B.E. Gunsalus. 1997. Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP) Technical Publication REG-001. South Florida Water Management District, Natural Resource Management Division, West Palm Beach, FL.

 

Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (MBWSR). 1998. Minnesota routine assessment method for evaluating wetland functions (MNRAM) Draft version 2.0. Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, St. Paul, MN. 39 pp.

 

 

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 1997. Interim guidance for making wetland minimal effect/mitigation decisions for USDA programs in Alaska (Aug. 1997). Web site: http://159.189.24.10/wlistates/alaska.htm

 

NRCS. 1998a. Interim functional assessment model for playa wetlands (revised draft 1/22/98). Web site: http://159.189.24.10/wlistates/playas.htm

 

NRCS. 1998b. Interim functional assessment model for Southeast coastal states. Initial model format by R. Rheinhardt and M. Brinson. Modified and compiled by N.E. Fleming and J.G. Sandifer, Jr. Web site: http://159.189.24.10/wlistates/secoast.htm

 

NRCS. 1998c. Interim functional assessment model for slope (linear) wetlands of the prairie pothole region in eastern South Dakota (Initial review draft). Web site: http://159.189.24.10/wlistates/sdakota.htm

 

NRCS. 1998d. Interim Hawaii procedure for determinations of wetland minimal effect (MW). Web site: http://159.189.24.10/wlistates/hawaii.htm

 

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). 1995. Guidance for rating the values of wetlands in North Carolina. Raleigh, NC. 57 pp.

 

Palmer, J.H. 1995. Wildlife assessment and management PAM HEP habitat suitability index model manual. Pennsylvania Game Commission, Bureau of Land Management, Harrisburg, PA.

 

Palmer, J.H., M.T. Chezik, R.D. Heaslip, G.A. Rogalsky, D.J. Putman, R.W. McCoy, and J.A. Arway. 1985. Pennsylvania modified 1980 habitat evaluation procedure instruction manual, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, State College, PA.

 

Palmer, J.H., R.H. Muir, and T.M. Sabolcik. 1993. Wildlife habitat assessment and management system: Habitat evaluation procedure technology for wildlife management planning. Pennsylvania Game Commission, Bureau of Land Management, Harrisburg, PA.

 

Prichard, D., H. Barrett, J. Cagney, R. Clark, J. Fogg, K. Gebhart, P.L. Hansen, B. Mitchell, and D. Tippy. 1993. Riparian area management: Process for assessing proper functioning condition. TR 1737-9 (Revised 1998). Bureau of Land Management, BLM/SC/ST-93/003+1737+REV95+REV98, Service Center, CO. 51 pp.

 

Prichard, D., C. Bridges, R. Krapf, S. Leonard, and W. Hagenbuck. 1994. Riparian area management: Process for assessing proper functioning condition for lentic riparian-wetland areas. TR 1737-11. Bureau of Land Management, BLM/SC/ST-94/008+1737, Service Center, CO. 37 pp.

 

Roth, E., R. Olsen, P. Snow, and R. Sumner. 1996. Oregon freshwater wetland assessment methodology. 2nd edition. Oregon Division of State Lands, Salem, OR.

 

Schroeder, R.L. 1996. Wildlife community habitat evaluation: A model for deciduous palustrine forested wetlands in Maryland. Technical Report WRP-DE-14, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. 30 pp. + Appendix.

 

Smardon, R.C. and J.G. Fabos. 1976. Visual-cultural sub-model. Pages 35-51 In Larson, J.S. (ed). Models for assessment of freshwater wetlands, Publication No. 32, Water Resources Research Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

 

Smith, R.D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M.M. Brinson. 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-9. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. 88 pp.

 

Sousa, P.J. 1985. Habitat suitability index models: Blue-winged teal (breeding). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 82(10.114) 36 pp.

 

Sutter, L.A. and J.R. Wuenscher. 1996. NC-CREWS: A wetland functional assessment procedure for the North Carolina Coastal Area (Draft). Division of Coastal Management, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC. 61 pages + Appendices.

 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE). 1988a. The Minnesota wetland evaluation methodology for the North Central United States. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, St. Paul, MN.

 

USCOE. 1988b. Floodway determination using computer program HEC-1. Hydrologic Engineering Center.

 

USCOE. 1992. Computing water surface profiles with HEC-2 on a personal computer. Hydrologic Engineering Center, Training Document No. 26.

 

USCOE. 1995. The highway methodology workbook supplement. Wetland functions and values: A descriptive approach. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New England Division. NENEP-360-1-30a. 32 pp. Resources Council, Washington, D.C.

 

USCOE. 1997. National action plan to implement the hydrogeomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions. Federal Register 62(119):33607-33620.

 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1984. Technical report: Literature review of wetland evaluation methodologies. EPA Region 5, Chicago, IL.

 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1980. Habitat evaluation procedure (HEP) Manual (102 ESM). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

 

USFWS. 1981. Standards for the development of habitat suitability index models (103 ESM). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

 

Whited, M. 1997. The NRCS interim hydrogeomorphic approach to functional assessment: What should it entail? Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web site: http://159.189.24.10/wlinews/editin5a.htm

 

Whitlock, A.L., N.M. Jarman, J.A. Medina, and J.S. Larson. 1994a. WEThings: Wetland habitat indicators for nongame species. Volume I. TEI Publication 94-1. The Environmental Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. 45 pp.

 

Whitlock, A.L., N.M. Jarman, and J.S. Larson. 1994b. WEThings: Wetland habitat indicators for nongame species. Volume II. TEI Publication 94-2. The Environmental Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. 627 pp.

 

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 1992. Rapid Assessment Methodology for Evaluating Wetland Functional Values. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 9 pp.

 

World Wildlife Fund. 1992. Statewide wetland strategies: A guide to protecting and managing the resource. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

 

Zampella, R.A., R.G. Lathrop, J.A. Bognar, L.J. Craig, and K.J. Laidig. 1994. A watershed-based wetland assessment method for the New Jersey pinelands. Pinelands Commission, New Lisbon, NJ. 77 pp.